Iran Says Missile Programme Not Part of Talks With United States
By Abdulahi Musa
Iran has stated that its ballistic missile programme is not part of ongoing or future negotiations with the United States, reiterating that discussions between both countries are limited strictly to nuclear-related issues and broader efforts to reduce regional tensions.
Iranian officials maintained that the country’s missile capabilities remain a “red line” and are non-negotiable, despite renewed diplomatic engagement between Tehran and Washington aimed at easing long-standing hostilities and reaching a broader security understanding.
According to Iranian authorities, any potential talks with the United States will focus exclusively on the nuclear file, including enrichment activities, sanctions relief, and verification mechanisms, while excluding military capabilities such as missiles and regional defence programmes.
The position underscores Tehran’s longstanding stance that its missile programme is purely defensive and not open to external negotiation. Iranian leaders have consistently argued that the programme is essential for national security and regional deterrence.
The statement comes amid ongoing diplomatic efforts involving indirect negotiations mediated by third parties, as both nations explore possible frameworks for de-escalation following months of heightened tensions in the Middle East.
While discussions have reportedly made progress on certain economic and nuclear-related issues, Iran’s firm exclusion of its missile programme from the agenda highlights key sticking points that continue to complicate a comprehensive agreement.
Analysts note that the disagreement over missile capabilities remains one of the most sensitive obstacles in US-Iran relations, with Washington previously indicating interest in broader limitations while Tehran insists on maintaining full sovereignty over its defence systems.
Negotiations are expected to continue, though officials on both sides acknowledge that major differences remain unresolved, particularly regarding security guarantees and the scope of future agreements.

Comments
Post a Comment